Showing posts with label Four stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Four stars. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 February 2017

We Were Liars by E. Lockhart: Review

16143347
Author: E. Lockhart

Genre: Young-Adult, Contemporary
Pages: 242
Published: May 13, 2014
Publisher: Delacorte Press
Price: £5.59 (Paperback)
           £12.11 (Hardback)
           £2.99 (Kindle)
Series: Standalone
Source: Bought

Triggers (In book, review is safe): Death, Emotional Abuse, Blood, Serious Injury 

About the book (Taken from Goodreads):

A beautiful and distinguished family.

A private island.

A brilliant, damaged girl; a passionate, political boy.
A group of four friends—the Liars—whose friendship turns destructive.
A revolution. An accident. A secret.
Lies upon lies.
True love.
The truth.


My review:
This is such a weird book. Weird with its sentence structure, weird with its characters, weird with its plot and definitely weird with its ending. It's just very, very odd.

But weird is good... right? For the most part, I loved it! But, the first half was immensely boring. Which completely contradicts the whole 'I loved it' thing but just roll with it. The first half consisted of overly pretentious language and pretty shoddy character introductions. If you could tell me who each of the characters were, you'd be a better person than me.

One weird thing was the tendency to break away from the story so that Cadence, the main character, could tell us a fairy tale she'd written. They were about a king and his three daughters who acted differently in some completely different stories. I couldn't see any connection between them, but I might not have looked deep enough. They were actually really interesting! It's probably because they're the most famous fairytales smushed together. But, they were a God-send in the incredibly boring first half.

The way Lockhart structured some sentences was pretty weird too. There were a lot of short sentences, like, a lot. But they all worked? I don't know why but the massive amount of short sentences was everything. And sometimes the sentences
were written like this
for no reason.
Not going to lie, I loved that too.

The main Cadence is a bit of a drama queen. She has immense migraines that take her out for days at a time. But does she really need to use unnecessarily long and pretty nonsensical metaphors to describe them? Probably not. She's decided she wants to give something away every day. She gives away her pillow to a homeless girl, she gives away a picture of her grandmother with a piglet to a charity shop... I did tell you this book was weird (not the pillow, that was nice, just the picture, that was a tad odd). But, she did it not out of the goodness of her heart, but to make people feel sorry for her and to annoy her mum, or mummy as she calls her.No thanks.

I'll admit, a lot of Cadences problems are first-world, but after reading a lot of reviews for this book, I'd deem some of them a little unfair. The chronic pains she has isn't a first world problem. An abusive household isn't exactly a first world problem either. This was the reason for the majority of the controversy surrounding this book, and you're opinion may differ to mine. But even though Cadence can swim in pure gold if she so desired and go on a trip around Europe with her dad and have everything she's ever wanted, but, does it make her household any less abusive? No. The emotional abuse she has experienced in the past is not ok, even if she is rich. Yes, the family seems better when her POV is not a flashback, but that still doesn't excuse the past. She's bound to be a little mentally unstable and selfish with a family like that.

And for the other liars, they aren't as developed as much as I'd like. They each have a few key character traits and that's it. Johnny is the funny one, Miren is the bratty one and Gat is the pretentious one. That's pretty much it for Johnny and Mirren. That is their only defining points. Gat has a couple more because he's the love interest. They don't really lie, though. They don't really do much at all.

So, as you can imagine, the first half is ridiculously boring. 

Then the second half hits you like a train.

There is so.
Many
Feels.
Before I knew it I was crying. I didn't even like the characters all that much, but as soon as she started piecing her memories back together the 4 bratty teens became my best friends and I cared about each of them. I don't know what literary magic E. Lockhart used, but it worked. I just couldn't stop crying. I'd tell you why, but it's a huge spoiler and people will attack me with pitchforks and fire. I'm  still very confused as to why I got so upset. Am I more compassionate than I thought? Yet another reason why this book was incredibly strange.

So, if you want to read this, the weirdest book I've ever read, you're in for a wild time. Even with all its problems, and I'll admit, it's pretty problematic, I still love it. The main character is a spoilt drama queen, her friends are pretentious, just about everything is underdeveloped and the first half is just plain boring. If I can still love it with all those faults, it must really be a special book. 

Have you read 'We Were Liars'? Love it or hate it? Read any more of E. Lockhart's work? Let me know in the comments!

Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com





Sunday, 15 January 2017

Human Universe (Wonders of Brian Cox, #4) by Brian Cox and Andrew Cohen: Review

24803451Author: Brian Cox and Andrew Cohen
Genre: Science, Non-Fiction
Pages: 288
Published: September 11, 2014
Publisher: William Collins
Price: £5.84   (Paperback from the Book Depository)
          £17.46 (Hardback from the Book Depository) 
          £4.99   (Kindle Edition)
Series: Wonders of Brian Cox
Source: Bought

Trigger Warnings: None


About the book, taken from Amazon:

Human Universe tackles some of the greatest questions that humans have asked to try and understand the very nature of ourselves and the Universe in which we live.
Through the endless leaps of human minds, it explores the extraordinary depth of our knowledge today and where our curiosity may lead us in the future. With groundbreaking insight, it reveals how time, physics and chemistry came together to create a creature that can wonder at its own existence, blessed with an unquenchable thirst to discover not just where it came from, but how it can think, where it is going and if it is alone.
Accompanies the acclaimed BBC TV series.


My review:

Man, this book was awesome! It's my first time reading a non-fiction book of this sort, and I had no idea what to expect. Well, I sort of did... I knew that it could go one of two ways: I could be completely hooked, or it could bore the daylights out of me. And I think it did its fair share of both.

Three of the sections were amazing. They were beautifully written, compelling and incredibly inspiring. With the best, in my opinion, being 'Why are we here?'. 'Why are we here?' explained how we are each important, as we are a result ridiculously small odds and thousands of years of evolution, yet we are each insignificant in the grand scheme of things. The chance of you walking this earth is one in a billion, yet new babies are born every day, so it can't be that remarkable that you exist. The discussion that happened in this section was one of the most thought-provoking things I've ever read.

The only thing that I didn't particularly like about 'Human Universe' was its habit to leave me behind. I've only had a few months of A-Level study, so I didn't understand quite a lot of the things discussed, but that's definitely more my fault than the books. And due to my mind wondering to other things, rather than trying to understand material beyond my level, I had to reread many chapters. This happened quite often in the 'Are we alone?' and 'Who are we?' sections. I'll be sure to reread 'Human Universe' when I've studied the material in more depth.



Have you read 'Human Universe? Read any of  Brian Cox's other books? Have any non-fiction book recommendations? Let me know in the comments!



Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com









Sunday, 30 October 2016

The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins: Review

Author: Paula Hawkins
Genre: Thriller
Originally Published: 
Pages: 316
Prices: £6.49 (Hardback from Amazon)
            £3.85 (Paperback from Amazon)
            £4.99 (Kindle Edition)
Publisher: Doubleday
Series: Standalone
Source: Bought

About the book (Taken from Goodreads):

EVERY DAY THE SAME

Rachel takes the same commuter train every morning and night. Every day she rattles down the track, flashes past a stretch of cozy suburban homes, and stops at the signal that allows her to daily watch the same couple breakfasting on their deck. She’s even started to feel like she knows them. Jess and Jason, she calls them. Their life—as she sees it—is perfect. Not unlike the life she recently lost.



UNTIL TODAY

And then she sees something shocking. It’s only a minute until the train moves on, but it’s enough. Now everything’s changed. Unable to keep it to herself, Rachel goes to the police. But is she really as unreliable as they say? Soon she is deeply entangled not only in the investigation but in the lives of everyone involved. Has she done more harm than good?


My review:
I don't read many thrillers; in fact, the only other one I've ever read is 'Gone Girl' by Gillian Flynn and I'm glad I read this one! While personally, I didn't think it was quite as good as 'Gone Girl' the hype is still well deserved.



By the end of the book, I really cared about Rachel and her fight to recover the information she'd lost and her effort to conquer her alcoholism. I was genuinely disappointed when she gave in and had a drink and I actually clapped to myself whenever she hadn't had a drink in a while. 

All the characters were fantastic in their own special ways. One narrator was a drunk, the second was a liar and the third a cheat - so who could you trust?  They were all extremely well written, which made for very compulsive reading. Whenever I put the book down I just had to go back for more! 


The only thing wrong with this book was the ending. The whole book built up to a whole load of nothing which was incredibly frustrating. I could guess who the killer was several chapters before the end, but still, everyone else was clueless. By the end, I was glad it was finally over, not because I didn't enjoy the book, just because the ending dragged way too long. The whole confrontation at the end was really strange... It was so unlike the characters involved and it left a really sour taste in my mouth. But, even if the ending did fall a little flat,  the rest of the novel was great, so,  four stars it is.



Have you read 'The Girl On the Train' yet? Is it really the next 'Gone Girl'? Did it deserve all the hype it received? Seen the movie yet? Leave a comment and let me know what you think!

Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com









Sunday, 23 October 2016

Nevernight (The Nevernight Chronicle, #1) by Jay Kristoff: Review

Author: Jay Kristoff
Genre: Young Adult, Fantasy
Originally Published: August 9, 2016
Pages: 429
Price: £9.09 (Hardback from Amazon)
          Paperback not yet released
          £7.99 Kindle Edition
Publisher: Harper Voyager
Series: The Nevernight Chronicle
Source: Bought

About the book (Taken from Goodreads):
In a land where three suns almost never set, a fledgeling killer joins a school of assassins, seeking vengeance against the powers who destroyed her family.Daughter of an executed traitor, Mia Corvere is barely able to escape her father’s failed rebellion with her life. Alone and friendless, she hides in a city built from the bones of a dead god, hunted by the Senate and her father’s former comrades. But her gift for speaking with the shadows leads her to the door of a retired killer, and a future she never imagined.Now, Mia is apprenticed to the deadliest flock of assassins in the entire Republic—the Red Church. If she bests her fellow students in contests of steel, poison and the subtle arts, she’ll be inducted among the Blades of the Lady of Blessed Murder, and one step closer to the vengeance she desires. But a killer is loose within the Church’s halls, the bloody secrets of Mia’s past return to haunt her, and a plot to bring down the entire congregation is unfolding in the shadows she so loves.

Will she even survive to initiation, let alone have her revenge?

My review:
Holy crap this book was good! You can really tell that Kristoff doesn't believe in happy endings, sheesh. I'm going to try and give a spoiler free review, but trust me, that's going to be difficult... THE FEELS ARE SO STRONG! 

Nevernight took me a mega long time to read, about 2 months, because of school work and procrastination and all that jazz. So my memories of the start of the book are a little foggy, but I can definitely remember that it took me a super long time to get into it. The little notes at the bottom of the page kept breaking the story apart with some pretty boring and mostly useless facts. Yes, some were pretty witty, but that was rare.

But other than that, I can't really fault Nevernight! The characters were all great and their storylines just kept getting better. Plus Mr Kindly is fab AF. If I had the confidence to say what I wanted when I wanted, I'd sound just like Mr. Kindly... I'm so jealous of Mia when it comes to that shadow cat!

Let's talk about Tric. If you've read Nevernight then you'll probably know my pain. Tric's past is heart-breaking, Tric's present is heart-breaking and Tric's future is heart-breaking. The epilogue was the most satisfying thing ever, the death of a character has never been so satisfying. Tric, everyone loves you. <3

To put Tric aside for a second, THAT ENDING THOUGH!! I can honestly say that did not see that major plot twist coming! The only thing I can say about those is that they are what I call slippery Salmons (Incase you want to know what that little inside joke means, I'll fill you in, it's basically my family's version of calling somebody a snake. But me and my brother's like snakes, so we say that someone is a 'slippery salmon' instead. It's a bit weird, but weird is my family's motto).

I can't really go into much detail because all the best bits are massive spoilers. So if you're wondering why this review is a bit of a flop, that's why. But seriously, if you've got the book, read it. The little foot-note things got easier and the ending makes this book close to perfection. If you've bought this book or got it in owlcrate or something like that, don't put it off, it's wonderful! Plus, I NEED someone to discuss the feels with!



Have you read Nevernight yet? Experiencing heartbreak at the hands of Kristoff? Need the second book now? Let's talk about it in the comments!

Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com







monthly funko pop vinyls

Sunday, 25 September 2016

Truth (Oleah Chronicles, #1) by Michelle Johnson: Review

Author: Michelle Johnson
25626729Genre: Paranormal, Young Adult
Originally Published: May 25, 2015
Pages: 220
Price: £6.25 (Paperback from Amazon)
           £0.91 (Kindle edition)
Publisher: MJ Publishing
Series: Oleah Chronicles
Source: Given in exchange for an honest review

About the book (Taken from the blurb):
What would you do if everything you thought to be true in your life is a lie?
Sixteen-year-old Angel Seriki is forced to face overwhelming truths about her so-called ordinary family when she meets Zander Black; a new student to her high school who is smart, charming and devastatingly beautiful. The revelations he uncovers to her about a danger that threatens to resurface from a past she never knew was her own, changes everything. Life as she knows it will never be the same again. In order to keep her family safe she has no choice but to trust Zander, despite his connection to her enemy. He's the only resource she has if she ever expects to understand the true reality of who and what she is. However, things become complicated when neither can ignore the magnetic energy between them. As their relationship and feelings deepen, so do the risks involved. She must now accept her fate, even if that means giving up everything she knows, including being human. 

My review:
This was a pleasant surprise! I wasn't sure what I'd think about this for two reasons... 1) It's self-published which normally means it's dodgy erotica or really crap (it was neither of these thankfully) and 2) there wasn't many other reviews out there when I started reading this, so I was going in blind... But I'm so glad I took the risk!

Angel, the protagonist, was a really likeable and cutesy character that shows what it's like being a teen, other than the fact she's not a human, obviously. The only fault I have with Angel is her choice of crew. Zander is a tool and she deserves better. That's all I'm going to say about that. But don't get me started on Julie... She's the perfect stereotype and the perfect nightmare. The teens in this book are 17 and I'm only a year younger so I can guarantee that teens do not act like Julie does. If my best friend started having a full blown mental breakdown, started feeling sick at all times, and generally started acting like she just found out she wasn't human, I'd notice. However, Julie doesn't have a clue. She doesn't see what's happening a cm in front of her nose and it started to get so annoying. They're supposed to be best friends! I don't know how friendships work in this fictional America but in real life Britain they are not like this. That is another thing I can guarantee. 

The style of writing is a little different too... Not bad, just different, and it definitely takes some getting used to. It's written in really simplistic language, which I warmed up to, weirdly.  It reminds me a lot of the sort of language in a middle-grade book, with the occasional out-of-place word. But I figured this was a good choice on Johnson's part, because if you're going to have a really ambitious storyline, it's easy to overwhelm if it's paired with complex language. So having simpler language puts more emphasis on the story, which was a clever thing on Johnson's part. But I'd rank it more a middle-grade book than a young-adult book. But maybe that's just me!

Anyway! To conclude, I did really enjoy 'Truth'! Angel is a great protagonist and I can tell the story is only going to improve! The only fault I can pick out is Julie... I don't like her. But other than that, it was fantastic! So should you read it? Yeah! It's a really fun and light read that won't take you too long to finish, and besides, it's always good to support your indie authors!
Have you read 'Truth' yet? How often do you read self-published books? Hate the oblivious friend stereotype? Start a convo in the chat down below!



Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com


Sunday, 18 September 2016

The Apartment by S.L Grey: Review

31342028Author: S.L Grey
Genre: Horror
Originally Published: July 26, 2016
Pages: 368
Price: £13.99 (Paperback from W.H Smiths)
Publisher: Pan Macmillan
Series: Standalone
Source: Bought

About the book:
Mark and Steph are struggling to move on with their lives after armed robbers broke into their home and brutalised them. Shaken, they decided to get away and leave their troubles behind. A house swap in Paris with a couple they meet online, the Petits, seems to provide the perfect escape. But upon arriving for a week's luxurious break, they find themselves in a festering, run-down apartment. And when Steph attempts to contact the Petits, she gets no answer.
Unable to relax following a series of increasingly unsettling events, they decide to return home. Yet when they arrive, neither of them can shake the feeling that there's now something sinister about their own house. As time passes, Mark is terrorised by a series of unsettling visions. But is it all in his imagination or is there a far more worrying explanation...?

My review:
This book was exciting for a number of reasons, 1) it was my first horror, which was mega exciting, 2) half of it was set in Paris and who doesn't love Paris? and 3) it sounded so damn cool. But was it as good as I was expecting? Not entirely...

It managed to create an atmosphere that was undeniably good. It put you on edge, but wasn't too scary, which fitted the scenes pretty well. The atmosphere was great! The plot just didn't back it up very well. In the end, it was deflating because I knew it could have given more. They had such a good idea to work with, with the perfect characters, in the perfect setting; there just wasn't enough done with them. The few events that did happen left me thinking 'ooh that was a bit weird' but is that good enough to call it a horror? To be honest, I'm not sure. As I said earlier, I've haven't read a horror before, so that might just be what horrors are like, but from a 'horror' I was expecting to be more than a little weirded out.

The chapters also had alternating points of view between Mark and Steph. Bleh. If you've read any of my other reviews I go on about this all the time. I really don't like it. But this book made me hate it even more. Dear authors, I know I'm not the fountain of all knowledge, and I know that you do not write a book to please only me, but  please don't fill in missing parts from the previous chapter with the following chapter. That was a crap explenation, but let me develop... Mark did a lot of crazy shit near the end of the book, which I read about in Mark's chapter, as he did it. But then, in the following chapter with Steph, it went back to before he did it to play the scene out in her perspective. CHANGING THE POINT OF VIEW DOESN'T CHANGE THE CONTENT, IT'S JUST THE SAME THING TWICE. It made reading really sluggish for a while and made me think that they decided early on that the chapters would alternate but then they ran out of stuff for Steph to do. Normally, if it had happened once of twice I would have let it go, but it happened all the time. Mark did something, then it would play out again in Steph's chapter. This must have happened for at least 5 chapters, near the end. That's just less than 1/5 of the book. Yes, Steph did do some stuff after the whole Mark bit, but it was still half a chapter of me reading stuff I've already read. It annoyed me considerably.

To conclude, I know I've just been on a massive rant, but 'The Apartment' wasn't actually that bad. It's a good thing to read late October if you want to get a little spooked. It shouldn't scare you in any way, but it does get a little weird. The ending was a bit meh, but maybe I was just bitter because of the chapter thing, I don't know. Do I recommend it? Yeah, I know my review tells otherwise, but don't all my reviews? On the whole, I did enjoy most of it, and it's the perfect horror for people who don't want to actually get scared.


Do you read much horror? Excited for Halloween? Were you scared by 'The Apartment'? Let me know in the comments!

Follow me! Twitter          Instagram

Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com



monthly funko pop vinyls

Sunday, 28 August 2016

Everything Love Is by Claire King: Review

27779339Author: Claire King
Originally Published: July 28, 2016
Genre: Fiction
Publisher: Bloomsbury
Pages: 372
Source: Giveaway
Series: N/A
Price: £14.88 (Hardback from Amazon)
           Paperback not yet available
           £10.04 (Kindle Edition)



About the book (Taken from the blurb):

Baptiste Molino had devoted his life to other people's happiness. Moored on his houseboat on the edge of Toulouse, he helps his clients navigate the waters of contentment, yet remains careful never to make waves of his own.
Baptise is more concerned with his past than his future: particularly the mysterious circumstances of his birth and the identity of his birth mother. But Sophie, the young waitress in his local bar, believes it is time for Baptiste to rediscover passion, and leads him into the world on his doorstep that he has long tried to avoid.
However, it is Baptiste's new client who may end up being the one to change his perspective. Elegant and enigmatic, Amandine Rousseau is fast becoming a puzzle he longs to solve. As tensions rise on the streets of the city, Baptiste's determination to avoid both the highs and lows of love begins to waver. And when his mother's legacy finally reveals itself, he finds himself torn between pursuing his own happiness and safeguarding that of the ones he loves.


My review:

This is a tricky review to write. Don't get me wrong, it was a charming story that made me intrigued. But I feel like it was lacking something. And what annoys me the most is that I can't put my finger on what it's lacking...


It's got  alternating chapter points of view... which isn't my favourite. If you've read any of my other posts I make it painfully obvious. Sorry. But what I hate more than this is when it isn't made clear from the start whose point of view it's from. Because then my imagination becomes too active and that's not good for anything. I'd be reading and thinking maybe it's the chair! Maybe it's the house! Maybe it's the ghost of a random dog that died in 1732! Yeah, not good. At one point I genuinely thought Baptiste was having sex with an owl. As I said before, not good. And what made it worst was the fact that it took me about 150 pages to be sure on who it was. Which may have been me being stupid, or may have been purposely left a bit of a mystery, or maybe both? I'm not sure but if you do come to read this book, please let me know if you too thought that he had sex with an owl. I'm not crazy, I swear.


However, the writing nearer the end of the book got a lot better and was actually really clever! It made me start to ask questions to myself similar to the way Baptiste does at the start of the book. And I loved every second of it. I felt a lot closer to Baptiste in the second half of the book compared to the first, which is a shame really because if the writing in the first half was as good as it was in the second it could have been a lot better than it was.

But, to be fair, I think this book was written for people a lot older than me. I've never been in love, sadly. Well, unless you count books, or iced coffee, or my dogs, or Mistah J. Because if those are included then I've been in love loads of times. But I've never loved another human, apart from Mistah J, but even he's not real. So I couldn't relate to the book as much as I would have liked. 

To conclude, 'Everything love is' is a charming little story but it left me feeling, sort of...meh. The ending didn't really have the impact that it could have had, which left me a tad deflated. But, I think this book was written for people 30+, not 16 like me, so that the reader could relate to it more, which makes you more attached to the characters. At the end of the day, though, I did enjoy reading it and it was perfect for lounging around the pool. So, I would recommend it, just not to people my age. Therefore, 4 stars fits it perfectly.

Have you read this book yet? Did you think Baptise was getting it on with an owl? Enjoyed any other works by Claire King? Let me know!



Follow me! Twitter
Contact me! theintrovertswonderland@gmail.com







monthly funko pop vinyls

Sunday, 7 August 2016

The Countenance Divine by Michael Hughes: Review

Author: Michael Hughs
29748029Originally Published: August 11, 2016
Genre: Fantasy, Historical Fiction
Publisher: John Murray
Pages: 293
Source: Goodreads Giveaway
Series: Standalone
Price: £14.88 (Hardback from Amazon)
           £8.99 (Paperback from Amazon)
           £10.99 (Kindle Edition)

About the book (Taken from the blurb):
In 1999 a programmer is trying to fix the Millennium Bug, but can't shake the sense he's been chosen for something.
In 1888 five women are brutally murdered in the East End by a troubled young man in thrall to a mysterious master.
In 1777 an apprentice engraver called William Blake has a defining spiritual experience; thirteen years later this vision returns.
In 1666 poet and revolutionary John Milton completes the epic for which he will be remembered centuries later.

But where does the feeling come from that the world is about to end? 

My review:
This book is a perfect example of why I don't like books set in multiple timelines. The stories set in 1999, 1888 and nearer the end of 1777 were absolutely fantastic! They kept me on edge, they were interesting, they made me laugh... but the timeline in 1666 and early 1777 just had to ruin it. I didn't have any idea what was going on most of the time because I was so bored my mind just sort of shut off. Nothing really happened in those chapters until the ends, which redeemed 1777 but not 1666. I just wish *no spoilers* that the thing that happened in 1777 happened a little earlier because that was pretty cool. But, *no spoilers* the thing that happened in 1666 was the most anti-climatic and underwhelming thing I've ever read. I get that Hughes wanted to keep the story semi-historically accurate but come on.

  If any of you were to ask me how the book ended, I would have no clue how to answer you. Literally no idea. I'm guessing this is a book you need to read a few times to fully understand it because otherwise, what the hell just happened? I can definitely see myself re-reading this book, just for the letters from Jack the Ripper (which were fricken awesome btw), so maybe I'll understand it more then? I really hope so, because not understanding sucks. 

Another thing that I found challenging in this book is the length of the chapters. If any of you have read my reviews before, I constantly say that I am not a patient girl. I like finishing chapters, that's what motivates me to carry on reading, but the average chapter length was 26 pages and for me, that's a lot. To be a little fairer, each chapter was spread across each of the timelines, which kept things at least a little interesting. But when your OCD only lets you finish reading at the end of chapters, it gets frustrating. 

To wrap this up, books set across different timelines are not my thing. Never have been, never will be. But this is definitely one of the best I've read in a long time. It gets a little boring at times, but the amazingness of 1999 and 1888 saves it a lot. If it was just those two, and 1777 if it got to the point a little faster, it would easily be 5 stars. If it was just 1666 and 1777 (1777 staying how it is) it would be barely 2 stars. AARRGGHH I'M SO CONFLICTED! I'm going to have to go 4. Well, 3 and 3/4 but I don't have that star picture. And that is purely down to the Jack the Ripper letters. Those should be a book in themselves. Seriously Hughes, get on that, I would buy that in a heartbeat. So, due to my conflicting opinions, read away, but definitely tell me what you think afterwards! 

How do you feel about books set across multiple timelines? Like longer chapters? Think I'm being too harsh? Comment down below and tell me what you think"



Follow me! Twitter




monthly funko pop vinyls